Did you know Hayling schools make Hampshire’s top 10 most congested? That’s awful for such a flat, compact community.
All of the 5 Hayling Island schools lie on the busy main road (Havant Road, Church Road & Elm Grove) which serves the Mengham shopping area, and the entire large residential area at the south of the island. At rush hour it’s even busier, with lots of queueing.
The proportion of pupils and staff who cycle to school is very low, according to Hampshire County Council Travel Team .
79% of pupils are driven to the two Mill Rythe schools. The national average is 34%.
Most schools’ walking rates hover around 50%. The last figures we have for Mill Rythe Infant school showed only 4.5% of pupils walk and barely 18% to the Junior school. A questionnaire conducted at Hayling College showed that 10% cycled against 50% using a car. Those that do cycle are often seen using the pavements around Hayling College.
Since the Travel Team survey, the Cinder Track has been upgraded for cycling by Hampshire County Council. although the surface is stony, and not very easy for pushchairs or scooters. Mill Rythe Junior School conducted a new survey of travel behaviour which found that car use has fallen to 68%, 16% walk, 12% cycle or use a scooter, and 4% use the bus. That suggests a significant improvement that we hope to continue over time.
More safe cycling routes to the schools would allow more students to cycle to school and college, and help keep them off the pavements. They would also encourage school and college staff to cycle to work.
The links below explore the benefits and issues of school cycle routes and describe the main routes we are working on.
If you would like to know more, please contact Dave Mowatt at email@example.com
Improve children's health and well-being
Cycling gives children exercise in the open air, increasing fitness and encouraging an active lifestyle. It also gives them independence from the “Mum and Dad taxi company”. Training schemes – notably Bikeability – help children learn how to cycle safely, manage risk and to take responsibility for their actions.
Set good patterns for future life
They say “You never forget how to ride a bike”. It’s true, many adults getting back into cycling first started as children. Equally, people that never learned to ride a bike as children can see learning in later years as difficult.
Improve safety for children, pedestrians and other road users
We’ve all seen children:
- Cycling without proper care and attention
- Cycling without lights
- Taking unnecessary risks
- Reacting unpredictably to traffic conditions
It is a major concern for parents – and for other road users. In many cases that results in:
- Children not being allowed to cycle to school
- Children riding on the pavement and intimidating pedestrians
Safe cycle routes to school which avoids roads would reduce risk not only for the children but also for pedestrians and other road users.
Reduce rush hour traffic
It’s immediately noticeable when schools are on holiday. Our roads are much quieter immediately before and after school times. Safe cycle routes to school means fewer children being driven to and from school by car – for most parents cutting out four car trips a day! The congestion of parked cars around school gates is reduced and the short, fuel inefficient, jouney to school is avoided.
The main routes we’re working on:
Footpath 88 (the old Cinder Track)
Mill Rythe to Tournebury Lane via Eastwood Close, Footpath 88, was upgraded for cycling in 2013. The old cinder surface (hence the name Cinder Track) was given a wider and somewhat smoother surface and made officially available to cyclists. People have always cycled it unofficially, but now it can be signed, and we can put it on our cycle map.
However. people tell us the surface is stony, and not easy for pushchairs, buggies or scooters. It is more all-weather than before, and less subject to puddling, but not ideal.
The footpath borders the Hayling College playing fields with a spur footpath running along the southern border with entrances onto the college grounds.
Link from footpath 88 to the Mill Rythe Campus
We had hoped for a new path extending the upgraded Cinder Track directly into the Mill Rythe Junior and Infant schools so that children no longer have to navigate through parked cars and cars dropping other children off to school.
£10K funding was potentially available from Living Streets, with another potential £10k matched council funding. We had the support of the landowner and all the stakeholders.
However, we ran into big complications with ecology and cost, which we could not find a way around at the time. The landowner even offered to perform the work for the available funding, but as they were not ‘an approved HCC contractor’, we were refused permission, to great frustration of all those involved.
It remains a long term ambition.
Footpath 89 - St Mary's Church to Manor Rd via Higworth Lane
This is the first leg of the new East-West cycle path, and is included in HBC’s 2017 Feasibility Report, and now in the project list for 2019/2020. It involves converting the existing public footpath 89 to dual use.
Since it runs through the church graveyard, it has involved sensitive negotiations with the church, but these appear to have been overcome, although cyclists will be asked to walk through the graveyard itself.
However, although Parkdean, who own some of the land, have given verbal approval, we understand they still haven’t given HBC legal approval to start work. There is also an issue with an anti-motorcycle barrier, which does not actually stop most anti-social motorcyclists, but does stop many legitimate users.
Also, the councils are insisting on a rough unsealed surface, which puts off many users, especially in wet weather. We think our ‘Smooth the Path‘ campaign applies just as much to this path as any other. Kids cannot get to school covered in mud!
Footpath 102 - Beech Grove to Mengham Lane
Since the Halyards Estate was built, we have a good-ish sealed route from Beech Grove to Mengham Junior School and the Legion Field. And there will be a sealed path from Hawthorne Grove across the Legion Field. Mengham Infant School is directly across the road (Elm Grove) to the west.
However cycling further south to Mengham Lane remains a stubborn problem. Bellway could easily have left a path through to Goldring Close, but they refused point blank, and because the planning was initially refused and then won at appeal, the council lost all rights to insist. That is a massive failure of the planning system to protect the community from commercial pressures.
Although many people do cycle on public footpath 102, it is not officially permitted, so we and the council can’t add it to our cycle maps, and the council won’t signpost it. There are two paths to it from the Halyard’s estate , but the last 110 metres are very narrow, and in wet weather, it’s completely impassable for anyone. The 2019 council plans include levelling and improving the surface, and improving the drainage, but it will not be all-weather. And they will not open it up to cycling, because it is too narrow. The photo shows the last 110 metre section running parallel to My Lord’s Lane.
There is a perfect alternative path alongside it, which the landowner did initially consider allowing for cycling, but this offer was subsequently withdrawn. We remain hopeful they might be persuaded in future.
The most northerly part of footpath 102 (approximately 310 metres) is wide and often cycled, but since you can now cycle through Halyards, it will not be permitted as an official cycle route.
There is a short spur public footpath (101) along the back of Mengham Junior school grounds, linking Legion Field to Heron’s Way. This is muddy and flooded in wet weather, and badly needs a sealed surface. However, although it runs along the side of the housing estate, it is still classed as a ‘rural’ footpath, and HCC will not allow it to be sealed. It’s too narrow to be officially a cycle route, although people do cycle it, but parents with children should be able to use it without needing wellingtons.
Footpath 102 - Mengham Lane to Salterns Lane
The southern section of footpath 102 is a wide, cycleable path of approximately 300 metres. It just needs an all weather finish, and removal of the exposed barbed wire, and this has been approved in principle. However the tree roots make a decent all-weather surface problematical and expensive. The horse field next to it is now being considered for building over the next few years, and if this happens, we have been promised that it would include a proper cycle path, and therefore the council is reluctant to spend money on a short term solution.
This is all very well, but we were let down on the Goldring Close development, and in the meantime, the detour through Mengham is long and dangerous.
What do you think the council should do?
North-south off-road cycle route
We are running this as a separate project in its own right because it would provide a major route for all types of cyclist including those looking for a traffic-free route onto and off the island.
Map showing all the routes
Would the children use the routes?
There’s good reason to believe so:
- Pressure/encouragement from parents and teachers
- Peer pressure once use is established
- Benefits to parents and children
The upgraded Cinder Track Is already popular, despite the poor surface, and there is evidence it has reduced car use somewhat.
Wouldn't they cost a lot?
We don’t believe so. We’ve spent time looking at the routes with Havant Borough Council, Hampshire County Council and the land-owners, and most of the cost will be upgrading the current surface. Compared to road improvements, the cost is miniscule.
Our ‘Smooth the Path‘ campaign shows that a proper sealed surface only costs 15% more than the inferior rough surfaces we’re currently using, and need no maintenance for decades instead of a few years.
Do teaching staff support cycle routes?
Throughout the progressing of this scheme Cycle Hayling has discussed the proposal with representatives from all the Hayling schools and kept them informed of progress. They have been very supportive and keen to see these routes implemented.
Mengham Junior School is leading the charge, and has already the ‘Silver’ award for sustainable travel with Modeshift Stars.
Will the council cooperate?
Yes. Safe cycle routes to school are a high priority – for obvious reasons. There is funding set aside specifically for creating safe routes to schools. Cycle Hayling first proposed this scheme in 2010 and Hampshire County Council and Havant Borough Council have been supportive ever since.
Hampshire County Council has already upgraded the Cinder Track and are keen to do more as funding becomes available. But they are resisting the use of sealed surfaces, which is preventing all-weather use and getting into the habit of everyday walking and cycling.
If you want to support our efforts, please register your support.
Cycle Hayling is investigating other possible additions to the Safe Routes to School scheme. If you have any suggestions, please let us know.
Progress to date
Posted on: August 9, 2019 by: Wilf
Why is building cycle paths so hard? Why does it take so long? Is it the councils? Money? Lack of will? Too much regulation?
After 9 years of Cycle Hayling, we’re finally building our own cycle path at Denhill Close (with council money), and we’re finding out the problems for ourselves.
So who is responsible for building cycle paths? Everyone, and no-one. And that’s the problem.
Havant Brough Council (HBC)
is the local lead player, because it has the local knowledge, the contacts, and the expertise, and has been delegated the task by Hampshire County Council (HCC).
Hampshire County Council (HCC)
retains project and financial control. Every project has to work through the HCC gateway process, which is incredibly time-consuming and expensive. Because that’s designed for big projects, HCC insists on batching smaller projects to get economies of scale, but that makes each project bigger and more cumbersome, so the inevitable delay to one project delays them all. So weeks become months, and months become years. HBC is as frustrated with this micromanagement as we are.
need to approve anything near their roads. Highways England manage the trunk network, including the A27 and the Havant roundabout, and they want bikes as far away from their roads as possible.
Hampshire Highways manage the smaller roads, including Hayling’s A3023, and again, they’re flat out trying to keep traffic flowing, so bikes are low priority, and even lower in the queue for money.
Public Rights of Way
are where most of Hayling’s potential cycleways run, including our planned Denhill Close cycle path. Rights of Way are managed by HCC Countryside Services (HCS). The clue’s in the name, they promote ‘countryside’, so they insist on ‘natural’ (i.e. rough) surfaces, even when the landowner doesn’t. HCS policy is that any ‘sealed’ surfaces must be handed over to Hampshire Highways (HH), but HH is refusing to accept any new ones, on budget grounds.
At Denhill, we’ve finally convinced HCS to accept that rough surfaces don’t work for cyclists, or pushchairs, or for the disabled, and to allow tar and chip, like the Langstone Billy Trail, but it’s taken a year. That will set our standard for all new cycle paths,
is playing an ever bigger role (rightly so, with climate change, etc). That’s why the Hayling Park cycle path widening was delayed for two years, because the council tree officers wouldn’t permit hard surfaces over tree roots, and HCC don’t allow flexible surfaces. It’s finally scheduled for 2020.
And why the Northney road shore path is on permanent hold, putting people at serious risk walking on a dangerous road at night with no street lights. And even if Natural England do eventually permit it, it will only be wide enough for a footpath not a cycleway, and not high enough to stop the regular road flooding that will only increase with climate change and sea level rise. Considering the widespread environmental abuse elsewhere, it’s difficult to see that we’ve got the right balance yet.
is needed for any new cycle path, of course, which is a big ask, with land so scarce and so valuable. Cycle Hayling has found some Hayling landowners to be brilliant, some less so.
It’s worse if the land has prospects for future development, as cycle paths might reduce the number of houses that could be built, and therefore the value. Planning permission gives councils some leverage to push for cycle paths, but it’s limited. If no other solution can be found, councils do have powers of compulsory purchase, but they’re almost never used.
is needed to create a cycle path, unless you can persuade the council that it falls under their very limited ‘permitted development’ powers. That’s what we’ve managed to do at Denhill Close.
need to be signed for landowner permission, new rights of way, and for contractors to be allowed to work, which all take time and money.
Regulations around cycle paths
are set by the Department of Transport (DfT), but they were already out of date 20 years ago. Big cities like London and Manchester have rejected them, and developed their own, based on world class experience from Holland and Germany, but Havant are still obliged to follow them. For example, they force cyclists to stop at every minor entrance, instead of having the same priority as the road they’re next to.
And finally, it all comes down to money!
Cycle infrastructure is incredibly cheap beside every other form of transport, and provides a massive return on investment. But there is no transport budget to pay for it.
Just about the only funding available locally is CIL, or Community Infrastructure Levy, which is a levy on all new developments over about 10 houses. However, most of the nearly £half million from the Bellway ‘Halyards’ development will be consumed by two minor road improvements, with minimal benefit to cars or pedestrians, and none to cycling. That half million could have paid for Haylink, our proposed traffic-free cycle path from the Lidl roundabout to the bridge
This sounds like a ‘council of despair’
I find all this incredibly frustrating, as I’m sure you must do. But we can fix it.
- Backup their Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy with a mandatory percentage of the transport budget, and clear national and local responsibilities for delivering it.
- Update and simplify the Highway Code, road traffic laws and cycle infrastructure regulations to promote cycling and make cyclists feel safer.
- In most of Europe, cyclists have to be given minimum passing distances by law, vehicles in cycle accidents are assumed to be at fault unless they can show otherwise, and cycle paths get the same priority as cars at junctions and roundabouts.
- We need an ambitious plan for cycling across the whole region, and with Havant’s proposed LCWIP (Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan).
- Hampshire needs to coordinate, not micro-manage, and let Havant get on with the job.
- Havant must determine the cycle paths we need, and then use all its powers to build them. As a bare minimum, we need Haylink, a direct, traffic-free, all-weather route to the bridge.
- Until the DfT updates it’s obsolete infrastructure guidance, Havant must demand to be allowed to follow the modern cycling design standards used in London and the big cities.
So I hope you can see that we’re not dealing with a single entity, “The Council”, that just blocks everything, but a complex set of fiefdoms and constraints, in permanent conflict with each other. Often, it’s a lot easier for any of them to say “No” than to get all parties to say “Yes”.
BUT! There is huge goodwill amongst councillors and council officers, in Havant and Hampshire. We need to keep lobbying them to ‘do the right thing’, and build Hayling a cycle infrastructure for the future, for active travel and for a greener planet.Continue reading →
Posted on: March 9, 2019 by: Wilf
Since 2016, we’ve been publishing a monthly Cycle Hayling column in the Hayling Islander to keep everyone up to date with what’s going on (which we now publish on our website for anyone who doesn’t get the Islander).
However, as that’s aimed at the general public, we can’t always speak as freely as we’d like, and so we haven’t kept our supporters or our web site updated as much as we should have.
So here’s a summary of what’s been going on, to save you reading the whole website (which you’ll see we’re gradually updating). A lot has happened, so you can click any heading below to see it in bite-sized chunks ….Continue reading →
Posted on: January 23, 2019 by: Wilf
This is REALLY important because :
- A formal plan unlocks much more future government funding
- Implementing it becomes a formal policy of the whole council, not just the cycling team
- It forces developers to show how their housing plans fit into OUR bigger plan
- It forces all of us to plan for the best long term solution, rather than just for quick wins
Posted on: September 17, 2017 by: Wilf
Do watch this inspiring little video from Sustrans, showing one Primary School’s bike revolution. Turns out kids can have fun and get free and healthy exercise at the same time. And reduce congestion and parking problems at school.
Hayling’s schools support cycling, and our cycle routes to school are (slowly) getting better. Cycle Hayling wants to see kids on Hayling having fun and cycling to school. Wouldn’t it be great if by 2018 we could say that this video could have been made on Hayling!Continue reading →
Posted on: February 21, 2016 by: Sue Underwood
Consultation is now open on the council proposal to reduce the speed limit from 40 mph to 30 mph on the section of road between the Stoke end of Copse Lane and Northney village. Details of the proposal, ref. number AS/TRO/298, can be found at www.havant.gov.uk/tro
This is a route used by many cyclists to get on and off the island, so Cycle Hayling supporters may like to submit their views to the consultation, which is open until Friday 11th March 2016. Formal comments can be made via one of the following methods:
Using the online response form at the above web address
By email to firstname.lastname@example.org
- In writing to the acting solicitor to the council :
Acting Solicitor to the Council
Public Service Plaza
Civic Centre Road
Havant PO9 2AX
Posted on: June 19, 2015 by: Andy Henderson
We are pleased to announce a new section of cycle path alongside the main road out of Hayling.
It goes from the Mill Rythe roundabout to a little over half-way to the boat yard…Continue reading →
Posted on: February 23, 2015 by: Andy Henderson
Footpath 101 runs behind Mengham Junior School. The closure starts 28th February 2015.
You can see more detail including a map and suggested alternative route at:Continue reading →
Posted on: March 23, 2014 by: Andy Henderson
In this update…
- Footpath 88 extension project cancelled
- Billy Trail Phase 4 development
- Billy Trail south end development
- Issues with new cycle paths
- Bike security session
Posted on: December 5, 2013 by: Andy Henderson
This is the text of an email we sent to all Cycle Hayling supporters with email addresses on 5th December 2013…
Welcome to all our new supporters. You are helping us promote better cycling facilities on the Island.
In this update:
- Good news for the ‘Safe routes to school’ project
- More good news…
- …and even more
- New ‘Park and Stride’ scheme
- An appeal about cycle lights
- Watch out, there’s a thief about!
- North East Hayling Residents Association
- Hayling to Paris ride – update
Posted on: August 2, 2013 by: Andy Henderson
We recently updated the safe cycle routes to schools project page.
This note provides an update on each of the routes we are working on:
Footpath 88 (the Cinder Track)
Shown as route 1 on the map below.
Route now open. Hampshire County Council completed it in spring 2013. All feedback has been positive, which is very encouraging, especially as Hayling residents are renowned for voicing concerns!
Footpath 102 - Beech Grove to Salterns Lane
Shown as route 2 on the map below.
The landowner has given approval for a permissive route, but a “pinch point” is the main factor preventing go-ahead from Hampshire County Council. Cycle Hayling is discussing alternative options with HCC (e.g. short “dismount” section).
Footpath 89 - Higworth Lane to Church Road
Shown as route 3 on the map below.
The land is owned by Parkdean Holiday Park. The site manager has given agreement to the path, but we are awaiting final go-ahead from the chief executive. Havant Borough Council is hoping to implement this route in 2014 if funds allow.
North-south off-road cycle route
Shown as route 4 on the map below.
The landowner of southern section has given agreement.
The northern section still requires approval from Registered Riders Scheme (RRS) and relevant landowners. The RRS are unwilling to share this limited section of their existing routes. Having tried for some time, we have finally managed to open discussions with the RRS, but it is clear there is considerable opposition from RRS leaders to sharing the footpath. We are trying to address their concerns, because this appears to be the only feasible option for providing a safe north-south link. Havant Borough Council shares this view.
Link from footpath 88 to the Mill Rythe Campus
Shown as route 5 on the map below.
The main landowner (Hayling Island Builders Ltd) has given formal agreement to the link, provided they don’t incur any cost. The land is currently leased to A.D. Walter Ltd (a farm), which has been contacted by Cycle Hayling.
Active involvement by both Mill Rythe Headteachers and the Hampshire County Council Travel Team, which has adopted the project.
Site visit already carried out by Hants Principal Engineer. Feasibility study by Hampshire County Council will begin once legal clearance has been obtained.
£10k is potentially available for this project from Living Streets to spend straight away. Total cost may be more than £10k however, so we may need additional funding from Havant Borough Council.
Map showing all the routes